Turabian vs Chicago: What’s the Difference?

Turabian and Chicago are not two separate citation systems — Turabian is a student-adapted version of Chicago style. Understanding the relationship between them, and where they diverge in practice, prevents confusion when a professor or institution specifies one versus the other.


The Basic Relationship

Kate L. Turabian developed her style guide in 1937 as a simplified manual for University of Chicago students writing theses and dissertations. The full name of the guide is A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. It is based directly on The Chicago Manual of Style but streamlines and adapts the rules for academic student papers rather than published books and manuscripts.

FeatureChicago (CMOS)Turabian
Full nameThe Chicago Manual of Style, 17th ed.A Manual for Writers, 9th ed. (Turabian)
Intended audiencePublishers, editors, professional authorsStudents writing papers, theses, dissertations
Governing bodyUniversity of Chicago PressUniversity of Chicago Press (same)
Citation systemsNotes-Bibliography and Author-DateNotes-Bibliography and Author-Date
ScopeBroader — covers typesetting, indexing, contractsNarrower — focused on academic paper format

Where They Are Identical

For citation formatting — the actual way you write footnotes, bibliography entries, and in-text citations — Turabian and Chicago are functionally identical. A journal article footnote written to Turabian spec and one written to Chicago spec look the same:

¹ John A. Smith, "Memory consolidation during sleep in young adults," Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 34, no. 5 (2022): 915.

Where They Differ

AreaChicago (CMOS)Turabian
Paper formattingMinimal guidance (assumes typesetter handles layout)Detailed rules for margins, font, title pages, spacing
Title pageNot addressed (book-oriented)Specific format for student title pages
MarginsNot specified1 inch (2.54 cm) on all sides
Font and sizeNot specifiedTimes New Roman 12 pt or similar readable serif
Line spacingNot specified for papersDouble-spaced throughout
Page numbersNot specified for student papersTop right corner, starting from page 1
Thesis/dissertation formatNot coveredDedicated chapters on formatting requirements

Citation Format Examples: Turabian / Chicago (They Match)

Book — Notes-Bibliography

Footnote:
¹ Toni Morrison, Beloved (New York: Knopf, 1987), 22.

Bibliography:
Morrison, Toni. Beloved. New York: Knopf, 1987.

Journal Article — Author-Date

In-text: (Smith 2022, 45)

Reference list:
Smith, John A. 2022. "Memory consolidation during sleep in young adults." Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 34 (5): 912–928.

Which One Will Your Professor or Institution Specify?

History and humanities departments typically say «Chicago style.» When the context is a student paper, thesis, or dissertation, «Chicago style» almost always means following Turabian for formatting while applying Chicago citation rules — which are the same in both manuals.

If a professor specifies «Turabian,» follow the paper formatting rules in A Manual for Writers (margins, title page, line spacing) in addition to Chicago citation formatting. If they specify «Chicago,» apply the citation system and use sensible academic defaults for paper formatting — or ask for clarification on whether they want the full Turabian layout.

Turabian vs Chicago vs APA: Quick Reference

FeatureTurabian/Chicago NBChicago Author-DateAPA 7th
In-text formatFootnote number(Author year, page)(Author, year, p. X)
End matterBibliographyReference listReferences
Primary fieldsHumanities, historySome social sciencesPsychology, social sciences
Author-year commaNo (NB doesn’t apply)No comma (Smith 2022)Comma (Smith, 2022)

For APA formatting guidance and templates, see the Normas APA resource center.

Sending
User Review
0 (0 votes)